Where the team actually decides
Your people and a panel of specialist AI agents run one structured decision session. Blind spots surface, dissent is captured, and you leave with a decision record you can defend.
Private beta for product & leadership teams. No credit card.
The status quo
Where good decisions quietly go wrong.
Every advisory tool you know runs solo. The moment your team has to decide together, the rigour disappears, and the same three failures creep in.
Blind spots stay hidden
No one is assigned to challenge the plan, so the risk nobody thought of is the one that lands.
Dissent gets averaged away
The loudest voice or the safest consensus wins, and the objection that mattered is never written down.
You can't defend the call later
Months on, all that survives is a vague memory, not the reasoning, the evidence, or who approved it.
Decidia adds the missing step. One structured decision session: blind spots surface, dissent is captured, and every claim leaves a record you can defend.
How it works
A governed flow, not a free-for-all
Stage 01
Frame the decision
Restate exactly what is being decided, the constraints, and what a good outcome looks like, so every perspective starts from the same brief.
Stage 02
Private first-pass views
Each specialist analyses independently before the group meets, eliminating anchoring and ensuring you get genuine disagreement, not a consensus echo.
Stage 03
Disagreement map
The chair surfaces where the panel agrees, where they clash, and which clash matters most, making the tension visible before debate begins.
Stage 04
Structured debate
Specialists challenge each other on the live disagreements. You interject at any point: redirect, add context, ask a specific question. The decision stays yours.
Stage 05
Decision brief
A defensible recommendation with options considered, risks flagged, dissent recorded, and open questions surfaced, for you to edit, challenge, and approve.
In the decision room
Bring your own panel
Each specialist analyses independently, the chair surfaces where they clash, and you interject when the decision needs your context.
Scoping the disagreement: Product Strategist and Sceptic are split on migration risk. We debate that specifically, not the billing features question.
We're assuming Paddle's tax handling saves us work. Has anyone validated that assumption for our UK + EU entities? It's the entire basis of the recommendation.
I dissent on the timeline estimate. Paddle is a 3-4 week rewrite of the billing surface. The Product Strategist's estimate doesn't account for webhook parity.
We do have a UK entity and an EU subsidiary. Paddle claimed they handle both but I've never tested it. This is the right blocker to surface.
Blind spots surfaced
Why Decidia
Four instruments in every session
Not AI chat. A structured decision workspace: governed, auditable, and built for decisions that matter.
Structured reasoning
Decision protocols, not freeform chat. The session follows a governed sequence so every blind spot has a stage that surfaces it.
Specialist perspectives
Real viewpoints: Product Strategist, Sceptic, Engineering Architect, Risk. Genuine friction, not consensus echo.
Auditable decision record
Every option considered, every dissent captured, every assumption flagged, in a record you can defend six months later.
Human governance
You approve the final record. Humans set the decision scope, can interject at any point, and own the outcome.
Provenance on every claim. Dissent in writing.
Every claim in the decision brief carries a source badge. Every disagreement is preserved, not smoothed away. Six months later, you know exactly why you decided what you decided, and what was left unresolved.
Decision record
ApprovedRebuild billing: retain Stripe
Recommendation
Retain Stripe for the rebuild. Paddle tax handling advantage is Assumption, unverified for UK + EU entities. Migration cost is Source-backed 3-4 weeks of engineering time at minimum.
Dissent recorded · 1 voice
Commercial Lead: Paddle's pricing model becomes favourable at scale. This decision should be revisited when ARR exceeds £2M. Model judgment
Trust & security
Built for decisions you can't get wrong
Workspace isolation
Row-level security on every table, tested cross-workspace boundaries with adversarial test suites.
Append-only audit trail
Every agent action, every approval, every turn, logged with DB-assigned sequence, tamper-evident.
Your data stays yours
Your decision content is never used to train models. You keep ownership of everything your team produces.
Bring your own model key
Route to your own provider keys via AI Gateway, or use private models on Enterprise.
The decision
Make the next big call one your team can defend.
Run your first decision session in under five minutes.